ヒマラヤの氷河が2035年までに融けて無くなる。これはIPCCが2年前に発表した”不都合な真実”。この事については以前このブログでも取り上げた：http://mikerosstky.spaces.live.com/Blog/cns!65DFD4754018BC2A!4366.entry
ヒマラヤの氷河が衰退しているのは温暖化だとされてきた。ネットで調べると沢山その様な情報を配信してきた事実が判る：
講演会および写真展「ヒマラヤ氷河から見える地球の温暖化」http://city.gotemba.shizuoka.jp/shiminkatsudo/event_2009/20090717_himalaya/
地球温暖化、ヒマラヤ地方の氷河にも影響 – 中国 http://www.afpbb.com/article/disaster-accidents-crime/disaster/2190097/1389840
しかし、インドの研究者がヒマラヤの氷河の衰退は温暖化が原因ではないと言うけんきゅう結果を発表した：http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/008200908090931.htm
講演会および写真展「ヒマラヤ氷河から見える地球の温暖化」http://city.gotemba.shizuoka.jp/shiminkatsudo/event_2009/20090717_himalaya/
地球温暖化、ヒマラヤ地方の氷河にも影響 – 中国 http://www.afpbb.com/article/disaster-accidents-crime/disaster/2190097/1389840
しかし、インドの研究者がヒマラヤの氷河の衰退は温暖化が原因ではないと言うけんきゅう結果を発表した：http://www.hindu.com/thehindu/holnus/008200908090931.htm
・・・
Timesオンラインの記事によるとそれ以前の問題が・・・ IPCCの発表の基となる研究について情報が浮上してきたのだ：http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/environment/article6991177.ece
In the past few days the scientists behind the warning have admitted that it was based on a news story in the New Scientist, a popular science journal, published eight years before the IPCC’s 2007 report.
It has also emerged that the New Scientist report was itself based on a short telephone interview with Syed Hasnain, a little-known Indian scientist then based at Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi.
Hasnain has since admitted that the claim was "speculation" and was not supported by any formal research. If confirmed it would be one of the most serious failures yet seen in climate research. The IPCC was set up precisely to ensure that world leaders had the best possible scientific advice on climate change.
Professor Murari Lal, who oversaw the chapter on glaciers in the IPCC report, said he would recommend that the claim about glaciers be dropped: "If Hasnain says officially that he never asserted this, or that it is a wrong presumption, than I will recommend that the assertion about Himalayan glaciers be removed from future IPCC assessments."
The IPCC’s reliance on Hasnain’s 1999 interview has been highlighted by Fred Pearce, the journalist who carried out the original interview for the New Scientist. Pearce said he rang Hasnain in India in 1999 after spotting his claims in an Indian magazine. Pearce said: "Hasnain told me then that he was bringing a report containing those numbers to Britain. The report had not been peer reviewed or formally published in a scientific journal and it had no formal status so I reported his work on that basis.
"Since then I have obtained a copy and it does not say what Hasnain said. In other words it does not mention 2035 as a date by which any Himalayan glaciers will melt. However, he did make clear that his comments related only to part of the Himalayan glaciers. not the whole massif."
1999年に発表された情報を基にIPCCはヒマラヤの氷河が無くなると発表。しかし、この情報はインドの研究者の電話での発言に基づいている事がわかった。これを調べたのは新聞記者。
ヒマラヤに関わるIPCCの発表は全く科学的な情報ではなかった！！
IPCCって科学的機構のはずなのですが・・・
IPCC信じられますか？ IPCCの発表に基づいて税金を政府が課そうとしています。
MikeRossTky
